Regardless of your business type, the customer is not a tool to make your business successful. You get that outcome when you create something of value and serve the customer like a servant.
Humility is implied here.
I'm a user and fan of Twitter. But I am also a thinker.
Had a couple of new followers (or so I thought) join my community, but Twitter doesn't list them on my page of followers. So are they following or not? Time will tell.
With this issue simmering, I found this blog from Jim Long at Verge New Media. I really dig his insights. Coincidence or not, check out his thought provoking post on Twitter.
This week Microsoft announced it wants to be like Apple, oops, I mean they intend to open a chain of retail stores.
I guess if you're sitting on as much cash as Microsoft you'd have a hankering to spend.
Maybe our federal government (hear in the USA) should open up a chain of retail stores. I can see it now; forms, regulations and bacon in one convenient spot.
Sorry for the rant.
Microsoft should focus on innovation.
Any amateur prophet can predict the future after the future becomes the present. The professionals predict even while they face the storm of criticism and isolation.
Makes you wonder who and what we're listening to.
I wrote this columnfor BizJournals back in August. It addresses the opportunity of social networks-inside and outside of the organization.
I hope it inspires!
Thought this post (Business Failure Commandments) from John Moore of Brand Autopsy would be fitting with my post yesterday on blocks.
Staying away from risk is the surest path to failure.
Seth Godin posts on The new standard of meetings and conferences. The piece provides practical approaches to making meetings/conferences work. But I’m most intrigued by the implication of how organizations accept the status que. The practice of pretending that yesterday’s dinner is really not left-overs.
I know many people who work in organizations that have meetings and interactions without knowing why. Maybe it falls under blind allegiance, maybe a desire to hold onto what once was.
Ever sat in a conference or meeting and found yourself more interested in your watch?
Acknowledged or not, many leaders are under the hypnotic spell of being ok and satisfied.
Time for some creative discomfort and dissatisfaction.
Took on a consulting project with a company who’s focus is on event marketing. As I talked to the president this morning, the following list came to my mind (we were discussing what customers care about specifically):
One thing was clear after our conversation; customers care about relationship (do you care, can you be trusted, can you be a difference-maker) and value (when the transaction is complete the customer feels good).
Scot over at Cube Rules posts this piece on email responsiveness. He has some helpful tips.
Scot’s post made me think of those who fail to respond. I don’t think it is ever ok (with the exception of extreme circumstances like system issues, human mistakes, etc.) to not respond. If you’re like me, there’s nothing that makes me angrier than a no response. Don’t people understand the idea of bridges burned. Besides, even if you don’t want what I’m offering, you can end the issue in one sentence or less and leave your reputation in tact.
So is it ok to not respond? What say you?
Thought it was important to update this post. Originally written in 2008, it's a daily reminder that trust is important in words-written or spoken.
"I have never thought of writing for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out, that is why I compose."
-Ludwig Von Beethoven
You may not need this post, but I'm going to proceed anyway. In the blogging world many talk about how to increase subscribers, increase hits/page views, or how to monetize the blog itself. Each of those efforts have merit. But why should someone who blogs want results like an increase in subscribers? I think many of us in the blogosphere have missed something in our motivations.
In a celebrity obsessed culture it is easy to get carried away by attention and notoriety. We forget what an authentic following means versus momentary infatuation. You could have a thousand subscribers, but does that really mean that something is being flipped? I don't think so. In my last days in corporate America I had a number of people who were "subscribers." Funny thing though, when I was escorted out my subscriber list fell dramatically. Did my ideas change? Did my expertise diminish? No, to all of those things and more. But my cache did.
So when I write (books, columns or blog posts) I make sure it comes from my heart. That way I can sleep at night knowing I didn't write in order to make a sale for a sale's sake. Believe me I had enough posing and posturing in corporate America to last me two lifetimes. No sense in resurrecting those tired positions for the sake of numbers. Besides, I really want change to be my partner.
If you're writing/communicating through a blog or some other portal, give people authentic content.